Why is it harder for Pakistan to renegotiate contracts with CPEC power producers than with other IPPs?

CPEC power plants operate under a government-to-government (G2G) framework backed by sovereign guarantees from both Pakistan and China. Any contract change requires bilateral consent at the state level, making unilateral renegotiation legally and diplomatically far more complex than adjusting deals with purely private domestic or Western-backed investors.

How much has Pakistan saved from renegotiating power purchase agreements with non-CPEC plants?

The government secured over Rs. 3.5 trillion in cumulative savings through revised agreements with 29 private and some state-owned generation plants. These savings are spread over contract terms of three to twenty years, with the last agreement running until 2053.

Will my electricity bill go down if Pakistan secures a concession from CPEC power producers?

A successful CPEC debt-reprofiling deal could reduce dollar-linked capacity payments and eventually feed through to lower end-consumer tariffs approved by NEPRA. However, no deal has been reached and Minister Leghari has not given a timeline, so bill reductions specifically linked to CPEC concessions are not imminent.

What is debt-reprofiling and how would it lower electricity costs in Pakistan?

Debt-reprofiling means extending the repayment timeline of CPEC project loans without necessarily cutting the total amount owed. This would reduce the annual capacity payments that DISCOs must make to CPEC IPPs each year, potentially lowering the per-unit electricity costs passed on to consumers through NEPRA tariffs.

How much has the government's power sector subsidy been reduced this fiscal year?

The budgeted power sector subsidy has dropped from Rs. 1.287 trillion last fiscal year to Rs. 890 billion in the current year, and is targeted to fall further to Rs. 830 billion in the coming fiscal year. System loss reductions, staff restructuring, and IPP renegotiations have all contributed to this decline.

PolicyHigh ImpactAI

Talks With Chinese Power Producers Yield No Result Yet, Leghari Confirms

Power Minister Awais Leghari confirmed that negotiations with CPEC-linked Chinese power producers have produced no meaningful concessions despite ongoing efforts at debt-reprofiling. Pakistan has secured over Rs. 3.5 trillion in savings by renegotiating deals with 29 other private and state-owned power plants, but CPEC's government-to-government framework makes similar concessions far more diplomatically complex.

PowerPost AI Bureau · Reviewed by Editorial TeamJun 1, 20263 min read0 views

ShareWhatsApp Tweet Facebook LinkedIn

Power Minister Awais Leghari confirmed on Sunday that negotiations with Chinese-backed independent power producers (IPPs) operating under the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) framework have yielded no sufficient outcome so far, even as Pakistan locked in over Rs. 3.5 trillion in cumulative savings from renegotiated deals with 29 other private and public-sector power plants.

Where the CPEC Talks Stand

Speaking at a press conference in Islamabad, Leghari said the government has been pursuing concessions specifically in the form of debt-reprofiling from CPEC-linked IPPs, but "sufficient results have not materialised yet." He stressed that any revision to those agreements must stay within the existing government-to-government (G2G) framework under which both Pakistan and China provided sovereign guarantees to project investors.

The minister acknowledged the political and diplomatic sensitivity of the negotiations. "We also have to respect investments that flowed in when no investor was ready to look towards Pakistan," he said, while expressing hope that "an agreement would be reached towards an improvement." No timeline was given for a breakthrough.

Rs. 3.5 Trillion Saved From Other IPP Renegotiations

The contrast with non-CPEC deals is stark. In March 2026, the government informed a parliamentary panel that revised power purchase agreements (PPAs) with 29 private power plants and several state-owned generation companies had locked in cumulative savings of more than Rs. 3.5 trillion across contract terms spanning three to twenty years. The final agreements in this portfolio run until 2053.

Key measures that contributed to those savings include:

Renegotiation and restructuring of power purchase agreements
Closure of ageing, high-cost generation plants
Reduction in system losses across the transmission and distribution network
Transfer of old Generation Company (Genco) staff to distribution companies (DISCOs)

Why CPEC IPPs Are a Special Case

CPEC power projects — primarily coal and gas plants built with Chinese financing under the Belt and Road Initiative — were commissioned under agreements backed by sovereign guarantees from both governments. This G2G structure makes unilateral renegotiation legally and diplomatically far more complex than adjusting deals with purely private domestic or Western-backed investors. Any material change requires bilateral consent at the state level.

An added complication is that CPEC capacity payments are denominated in US dollars. The sharp depreciation of the Pakistani rupee since these plants came online has significantly inflated their rupee-cost to end consumers. Debt-reprofiling — extending loan repayment timelines rather than cutting contracted rates — is the government's preferred route to reduce annual dollar-linked capacity payments without triggering formal contract breaches.

Power Sector Subsidy Falling Gradually

Leghari also pointed to progress on the broader subsidy front. The budgeted power sector subsidy has been cut from Rs. 1.287 trillion last fiscal year to Rs. 890 billion in the current year, with a further target of Rs. 830 billion in the coming fiscal year. System loss reductions, utilisation of fiscal space, and the structural reforms already completed with non-CPEC IPPs were cited as the primary drivers.

The power sector's chronic circular debt — the cash-flow shortfall that builds up when revenues collected by DISCOs fall short of payments owed to generators and fuel suppliers — has been a central condition of Pakistan's International Monetary Fund (IMF) programme, and reducing the subsidy bill is directly tied to meeting those benchmarks.

What This Means for Pakistani Consumers

Until Pakistan secures meaningful concessions from CPEC IPPs, households and businesses on LESCO, IESCO, MEPCO, FESCO, GEPCO, PESCO, HESCO, QESCO, TESCO, and K-Electric networks will continue absorbing high dollar-linked capacity payment costs embedded in their per-unit tariffs. The Rs. 3.5 trillion saved from other IPP deals has helped narrow the subsidy gap but has not yet translated into proportionate reductions in NEPRA-approved end-consumer rates.

Leghari's choice of words — "we hope an agreement would be reached" — signals no imminent CPEC breakthrough. Consumers should not count on a tariff cut tied to these talks in the near term, though the government's subsidy reduction targets for the coming fiscal year may eventually support modest NEPRA-approved base tariff relief if savings materialise as planned.

Frequently Asked

Questions about this story

Why is it harder for Pakistan to renegotiate contracts with CPEC power producers than with other IPPs?
CPEC power plants operate under a government-to-government (G2G) framework backed by sovereign guarantees from both Pakistan and China. Any contract change requires bilateral consent at the state level, making unilateral renegotiation legally and diplomatically far more complex than adjusting deals with purely private domestic or Western-backed investors.
How much has Pakistan saved from renegotiating power purchase agreements with non-CPEC plants?
The government secured over Rs. 3.5 trillion in cumulative savings through revised agreements with 29 private and some state-owned generation plants. These savings are spread over contract terms of three to twenty years, with the last agreement running until 2053.
Will my electricity bill go down if Pakistan secures a concession from CPEC power producers?
A successful CPEC debt-reprofiling deal could reduce dollar-linked capacity payments and eventually feed through to lower end-consumer tariffs approved by NEPRA. However, no deal has been reached and Minister Leghari has not given a timeline, so bill reductions specifically linked to CPEC concessions are not imminent.
What is debt-reprofiling and how would it lower electricity costs in Pakistan?
Debt-reprofiling means extending the repayment timeline of CPEC project loans without necessarily cutting the total amount owed. This would reduce the annual capacity payments that DISCOs must make to CPEC IPPs each year, potentially lowering the per-unit electricity costs passed on to consumers through NEPRA tariffs.
How much has the government's power sector subsidy been reduced this fiscal year?
The budgeted power sector subsidy has dropped from Rs. 1.287 trillion last fiscal year to Rs. 890 billion in the current year, and is targeted to fall further to Rs. 830 billion in the coming fiscal year. System loss reductions, staff restructuring, and IPP renegotiations have all contributed to this decline.

Free Newsletter

Get Pakistan's Energy Week in 3 Minutes

NEPRA decisions, tariff moves, solar updates, and load shedding news — one short email every week. No spam.

One email per week · Unsubscribe anytime · No spam